Legal Opinion

Fisk v. Patriot & Barkworks Turnpike Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Erom the Switerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Complaint by the appellants to enjoin the collection of certain assessments made against their lands, *480in favor of the Patriot and Barkworks Turnpike Company. The court adjudged that the appellees be enjoined and restrained, according to the prayer of the complaint, until the further order of the court. Afterwards the appellants filed the following affidavit for a change 'of venue:

“ Thomas H. Sutton, one of the plaintiffs in the above entitled cause, swears that he can not, and that his co-plaintiffs can not, as he verily believes, have a fair and impartial trial of the above entitled cause…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bosseker v. CramerIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Mershon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Manly v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Goldsby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Bronenberg v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Krutz v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Krutz v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Leathers, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Woodsmall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Debaun, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API