Legal Opinion

Goldsby v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Ployd Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

~Worden, J.

Information against the appellants for robbery. Trial, conviction and judgment.

At the proper time, the defendants moved for a change of *148venue, stating in their affidavit, as the ground of the motion, that they could not receive a fair trial, “ on account of the prejudices of the judge of said Court against them.” The motion was overruled, and exception taken. This was also one of the reasons for which a new trial was asked. We are of opinion that the change asked for should have been granted.

The statute provides for a change of venue in criminal cases for two causes: 1. “Prejudice…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Burkett v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  3. State ex rel. Egan v. WoleverIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Krutz v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. State Ex Rel. Rose v. Hoffman, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API