Legal Opinion

Frye v. Frye

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 28, 2012No. 2110024PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

In July 2010, Henry J. Frye (“the former husband”) filed a postdivorce action seeking to reduce his periodic-alimony obligation to Charmann Frye (“the former wife”). Following an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court entered a judgment that stated, in pertinent part:

“Pursuant to the terms of the divorce [judgment], the [former husband] was ordered to pay alimony to the [former wife] in the amount of $1,825.00 per month for a period of sixteen (16) months and thereafter in the amount of $2,200.00 per month for a period of forty-four (44) months. The total obligation of payments…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Dan Tucker Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Homes of Legend, Inc. v. McColloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Hager v. HagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Clark v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Byrd v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peace v. PeaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API