Legal Opinion
Frye v. Frye
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided September 28, 2012No. 2110024PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PITTMAN, Judge.
In July 2010, Henry J. Frye (“the former husband”) filed a postdivorce action seeking to reduce his periodic-alimony obligation to Charmann Frye (“the former wife”). Following an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court entered a judgment that stated, in pertinent part:
“Pursuant to the terms of the divorce [judgment], the [former husband] was ordered to pay alimony to the [former wife] in the amount of $1,825.00 per month for a period of sixteen (16) months and thereafter in the amount of $2,200.00 per month for a period of forty-four (44) months. The total obligation of payments…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte Dan Tucker Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Homes of Legend, Inc. v. McColloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Hager v. HagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Clark v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Byrd v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peace v. PeaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012