Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. Allred

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1965No. 767PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Plaintiff’s evidence, taken in the light most favorable to him, is sufficient to establish these facts: After having ascertained that no vehicle was approaching from the north within the limits of his visibility of 150 feet, with his signal light blinking, plaintiff attempted to make a left turn from the center lane of a 41-foot wide street into an intersecting 25-foot wide street in a 35 mph speed zone. When all but 4 feet of his automobile had cleared the intersection, it was struck on the right rear by defendant’s automobile, which stopped at the point of impact.

If the jury should find…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. SchafferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. MattoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Carr v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Hudson v. PETROLEUM TRANSIT COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Wright v. PegramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greene v. MeredithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Honeycutt v. BessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Hall v. KimberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Williams v. Standard Supply Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API