Legal Opinion

Monroe v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1994No. B14-93-00692-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying habeas corpus relief. In two points of error, appellant contends that he is being illegally detained because (1) the charge of attempted capital murder of a peace officer is barred by the jury’s acquittal; and (2) the lesser included charge of aggravated assault of a peace officer is barred by the statute of limitations, by not being contained in the indictment, and because appellant was acquitted of the greater offense of attempted capital murder of a peace officer. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Appellant,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HightCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  3. Ex Parte Crenshaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  4. State v. Atwood, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
  5. State v. Vanderbilt, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API