Legal Opinion
Kuhlman v. Arnold
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 2005No. WD 64011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge.
Oric Arnold appeals the default judgment of the trial court in favor of Howard Kuhlman. Mr. Arnold did not appeal the denial of his motion to set aside the default judgment, filed according to Rule 74.05(d). The appeal is dismissed.
Facts
In April 2001, Mr. Kuhlman and Mr. Arnold entered into an agreement whereby Mr. Arnold would restore Mr. Kuhl-man’s classic Cadillac for a total price of $60,000. The restoration was to be completed by June 1, 2002. In accordance with the agreement, Mr. Kuhlman paid Mr. Arnold $30,000 as a deposit and delivered the ear to him. Mr.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brants v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Rose v. RoseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Comstock v. ComstockMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- SATURN OF TIFFANY SPRINGS v. McDARISMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- AMG Franchises, Inc. v. Crack Team USA, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. McGeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hagan v. BuchananMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cooper v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.