Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cope v. Cooper

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1930No. 21985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This is an action in mandamus originally filed in this court, the petition being in the usual form, and containing a prayer for the allowance of an alternative writ requiring that the defendants perform certain acts or show cause at a time and place to be fixed by the court why they should not perform the acts. Notice was given to the defendants, and application was orally made to the court for the alternative writ, and, while the ap plication for the alternative writ was held nnder advisement by the court, a summons was issued. A motion to quash the service of summons has been filed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. City of FremontOhio Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Curran v. BrookesOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. First National Bank v. Village of BotkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. Cope v. CooperOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Fischer v. DammOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Marshall v. Civil Service CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API