Legal Opinion

Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 28, 2016No. Consol. 16-00145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER 1

EATON, Judge:

Before,-the court is plaintiff-intervenor Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.’s (“plaintiff-intervenor” or “Armstrong”) partial consent 2 motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin defendant, the United States (“defendant” or “the Government”), from liquidating its entries of multilayered wood flooring from the People’s Republic of China (“PRG”) during the pendency of this action. Pl,-Int.’s Mot. for Prelim. Inj. 1 (ECF Dkt. No. 16) (“Pl.Int.’s Br.”). Specifically, Armstrong, as a plaintiff-intervenor, asks that liquidation be enjoined for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Vinson v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Schneider v. Dumbarton Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Parkdale International v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Qingdao Taifa Group Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. NEXTEEL Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  2. New Mexico Garlic Growers Coalition v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  3. Jilin Bright Future Chems. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
  4. NEXTEEL Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API