Shaffer v. City of Topeka
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Beier, J.:
Plaintiffs Robert and Karen Shaffer ask us to reverse summary judgment granted in favor of defendant City of Topeka (City) on statute of limitations grounds. We decline and affirm.
A brief review of the facts is necessary to an understanding of our decision.
The Shaffers sustained water damage to their Topeka home, which they attributed to the City’s negligence in executing a shutoff order. They filed a claim with their insurance company, State Farm Fire & Casualty (State Farm), on November 8, 1998. On April 12, 1999, a State Farm representative sent a letter regarding the problem to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Bowen v. WesterhausSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Jackson Ex Rel. Essien v. Unified School District 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Rockers v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Robinson v. ShahCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Myers v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Myers v. BOARD OF JACKSON COUNTY COMM'RSSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. Coleman Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Vantage Investments, Inc. v. Loc Nguyen Corp. (In Re Vantage Investments, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2008
- Balmer Fund, Inc. v. City of HarperDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.