Legal Opinion
In Re Dow Corning Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 23, 1999No. 19-42655PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY OF CURTIS A. ORGILL.
ARTHUR J. SPECTOR, Chief Judge.
Counsel representing certain Nevada Claimants (the “Nevada Claimants”) proffered the expert testimony of Curtis A. Orgill in support of one of their objections to the confirmation of the joint plan of reorganization (the “Joint Plan”) proposed by the Debtor and the Official Committee of Tort Claimants (the “Proponents”). For the reasons stated below, the Proponents’ objection to the introduction of Mr. Orgill’s opinions is SUSTAINED.
I. Introduction
The Proponents filed the Joint Plan on November 9,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Kathleen Kremser JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wiand v. WaxenbergDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- Asad v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Berry v. School Dist. of City of Benton HarborDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- In Re BonhamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.