Legal Opinion
Asad v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 31, 2004No. 1:99 CV 2194PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE DAU-BERT HEARING AND THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT WITNESSES’ TESTIMONY
WELLS, District Judge.
The issue currently before the Court is the admissibility of expert testimony offered on behalf of plaintiffs Richard, Darlene, and William Asad and on behalf of defendant Continental Airlines, Inc. (“Continental”). The scope and admissibility of expert witness testimony has been litigated throughout this case. On 6 July 2001, defendant filed a motion to exclude the expert testimony of plaintiffs’ experts, Dr. Brautbar and Dr. Wiznitzer, or, in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- McLean v. 988011 Ontario, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jackson v. E-Z-Go Div. of Textron, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
- Ohio Environmental Development Ltd. Partnership v. Envirotest Systems Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Terry v. Ottawa County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental DelayOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Johnson v. Manitowoc Boom Trucks, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2005
- Matt Dietz Co. v. Torres, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.