Legal Opinion
State v. Waddell
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1996No. 1994-2462PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 163.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WADDELL, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Waddell,
1996-Ohio-100.] Trial procedure—Trial court has discretion to permit or prohibit note-taking by jurors—When note-taking is permitted, trial court should instruct jurors they are not required to take notes—Cautionary instructions to jurors about note-taking. __________________ 1. A trial court has the discretion to permit or prohibit note-taking by jurors. If a trial court determines that a particular case warrants note-taking, the court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. BarnetteOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Bridge, 1-06-30 (4-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. HarianOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.