Legal Opinion

State v. Bridge, 1-06-30 (4-16-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 2007No. 1-06-30PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Michael Bridge, appeals the judgment of the Allen County Court of Common Pleas, convicting him of one count of trafficking in cocaine and one count of possession of cocaine. On appeal, Bridge asserts that the jury instruction for complicity failed to state the correct legal premise resulting in plain error and that the jury verdicts were not supported by sufficient evidence. Finding that the jury instruction did not result in plain error and that the jury verdicts were supported by sufficient evidence, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

{¶ 2} In July…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. GrantOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. Adams, 3-06-24 (9-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. In Matter of Redmond, 1-06-90 (6-25-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. Howald, 14-08-23 (10-20-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API