Legal Opinion

Sipp Electric & Machine Co. v. Atwood-Morrison Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 2, 1906No. 32PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree sustaining the validity of the patent, No. 729,084, issued to Walter G. Morrison, for an alleged improvement in swift brackets for supporting swifts or reels on a winding frame. There was no question in the court below in regard to infringement, the contest being over the validity of the complainant’s patent. The defendant contended that, in view of the state of the art, complainant’s device was invalid for lack of invention, and that it was not a patentable combination, .but only an aggregation of familiar devices which had…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smyth Mfg. Co. v. SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  2. Rown v. Brake Testing Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  3. Virginia-Carolina Peanut Picker Co. v. Benthall Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
  4. Rokap Corp. v. LammDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1935
  5. United Kingdom Optical Co. v. American Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API