Legal Opinion
Bromley v. Michigan Education Ass'n-NEA
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 10, 1998No. 92-CV-10443-BCPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
CLELAND, District Judge.
Pending before the court are plaintiffs’ motions to amend and supplement the complaint and for class certification. The mo*151tions were exhaustively briefed and a hearing was held on December 17, 1997. For the reasons stated herein, both motions are GRANTED.
I. Background
The plaintiffs in this action are eighteen Michigan public college and public school employees who are not members of their local union affiliates of the Michigan Education Association (“MEA”)…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- In re Tri-State Crematory LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Finnerty v. Wireless Retail, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Popoola v. Md-Individual Practice Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.