Legal Opinion

State v. Saracino

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 17, 1979PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Per curiam

After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted, as charged, of the crime of larceny in the first degree by receiving stolen property in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-119 (8) and 53a-122 (a) (2). Upon the trial court’s denial of her motions for arrest of judgment and to set aside the verdict, the defendant has appealed. The determinative issue presented in this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction for first degree larceny.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, the following facts could have been found by the jury:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

State v. ChetcutiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
State v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

3Cited by67 opinions

State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
State v. StankowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
State v. ScielzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.