Wherley v. Foss
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the dismissal with prejudice of appellants’ complaint. The trial court dismissed on its own motion for failure to prosecute. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Wherley and respondent Foss were involved in an automobile collision on August 22, 1973. Three years later, the attorney for Wherleys began correspondence with Foss’s insurance company, in which the parties discussed the accident and possible settlement arrangements. The last letter was written on June 22, 1979.
A dispute as to proper service existed between the parties, but in March 1980, Foss…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Firoved v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Reichert v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Belton v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Copeland v. BraggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.