Meier v. Purdun
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
No action shall be brought upon a judgment rendered in any court of this state between the same parties (1) without leave of the court, (2) for good cause shown, and (3) on notice to the adverse party.
In his first motion for leave to sue on his 1962 judgment, the appellant, to establish “good cause shown,” stated in his affidavit that the respondents “neglected and refused to pay said judgment;” that, on information and belief, the respondents had “sufficient ability to pay the same if they choose to do so;” and that the “lien of said judgment has expired by lapse of time.”
In his renewed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Endeavor-Oxford Union Free High School District v. WaltersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Ingraham v. ChampionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Cole v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- First Wisconsin National Bank v. RischeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chase Lumber & Fuel Co., Inc. v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- United States v. EstesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1978
- Andersen v. KojoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Schneider v. AliasCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Meier v. PurdunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980