Legal Opinion

Endeavor-Oxford Union Free High School District v. Walters

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1955PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

Appellant maintains that the trial court failed to observe proper procedure in the appeal from the order of the joint committee, and that as a consequence, substantial rights of the appellant were prejudiced. It con tends that under valid procedure, the petitioners, after filing the notice of appeal, were obliged to file a complaint alleging particulars upon which the appeal was based and to which response could have been interposed by the joint committee, the appellants, or others interested. It urges that procedure identical with that employed in School Dist. v. Callahan (1941), 237 Wis.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. School District No. 3 of Adams v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Burdick v. TyrrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ex parte WillocksNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  4. Gaskin v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. Seiler v. O'MaleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Menge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Zawerschnik v. Joint County School CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hennen v. HennenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. BD. OF SEDGWICK COUNTY COMM'RSSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API