Griffin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Mere presence in a high crime area does not provide reasonable suspicion for a stop .and frisk. The police here — at every turn — lacked justification for their actions; •and Mr. Griffin’s motion to suppress should have been granted.
The facts here are simple and straightforward: with no reason to suspect criminal activity, an officer approached a man in a high-crime area standing in a driveway and immediately demanded he remove his hand from his pocket. When the man did nothing in response and refused to consent to a search, the officer conducted a weapons pat-down. During the weapons pat-.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- MARQUESE D. GOODMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- State of Florida v. Ricky Alphonso RandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- State of Florida v. Ricky Alphonso RandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- State of Florida v. Ricky Alphonso RandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016