Legal Opinion

Griffin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 2014No. 1D13-5589PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Mere presence in a high crime area does not provide reasonable suspicion for a stop .and frisk. The police here — at every turn — lacked justification for their actions; •and Mr. Griffin’s motion to suppress should have been granted.

The facts here are simple and straightforward: with no reason to suspect criminal activity, an officer approached a man in a high-crime area standing in a driveway and immediately demanded he remove his hand from his pocket. When the man did nothing in response and refused to consent to a search, the officer conducted a weapons pat-down. During the weapons pat-.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. MARQUESE D. GOODMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. State of Florida v. Ricky Alphonso RandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. State of Florida v. Ricky Alphonso RandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. State of Florida v. Ricky Alphonso RandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API