Cole v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
.-EMAS,J.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant, Albert Cole (“Cole”), appeals from the final judgment of conviction and sentence on the basis that the court erred in denying Cold’s motion to suppress physical evidence, and in denying three challenges for cause during jury selection. On appeal, the State commendably concedes that the trial court committed reversible error in at least one of its denials of the for-cause challenges, warranting a new trial. ■ Upon our review .of- the record, we agree and reverse for a new trial. We nevertheless address the first issue, and hold that the trial, court properly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MaxwellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- State v. PenaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- MARQUESE D. GOODMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019