Legal Opinion
Richards Conditioning Corp. v. Oleet
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 1968PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed, without costs, and the complaint dismissed in the following memorandum: The finding of substantial performance is supported by the record. However, plaintiff cannot recover on the agreement since the installation was not licensed and since it employed unlicensed personnel to install the air conditioning system. The air conditioning system is a “ refrigerating system ” within the meaning of chapter 93 of the General Ordinances of the City of Mount Vernon and, therefore, may not be installed by unlicensed persons. Since the purpose of the regulatory scheme is to protect the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Johnston v. . DahlgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
3Cited by42 opinions
- Benjamin v. KoeppelNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lloyd Capital Corp. v. Pat Henchar, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Charlebois v. J.M. Weller Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Todisco v. EconopoulyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Ellis v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.