Legal Opinion

People v. Petty

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1981No. Crim. 21418PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

Elwood Lee Petty, convicted of burglary and sentenced to prison for the upper term of three years, contends that the trial court erred in denying his request for appointment of new counsel, in admitting evidence of an uncharged prior offense, in failing to instruct the jury as to the requisite intent for aiding and abetting, and in sentencing him to the upper term. We find no reversible error, and affirm.

I. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s request for appointment of new counsel.

Appellant was an indigent defendant with court-appointed counsel…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. AlvaradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. People v. ClayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. La FargueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API