Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 30, 1927No. 3832PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs in error were found guilty of the willful violation of an injunction entered in a cause pending against them in the court below, brought by the Indianapolis Street Railway Company.
The railway company alleged in its complaint that it was engaged in transporting persons for hire in Indianapolis and contiguous territory by means of street cars and busses, as it by law was authorized to do; that in carrying on such business it had in its employ approximataely 1,100 men (motormen, conductors and bus drivers); that it had entered into a written contract with each…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Day v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927