Legal Opinion

Eastman v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1875PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. Henby Booth, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr.' Chief Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This prosecution was commenced under the last clause of section 1, chapter 24, of an ordinance of the city of Chicago, that declares “'any person who keeps a store, office, or place of business, for the purchase or sale of second-hand clothing, or garments of any kind, or second-hand goods, wares or merchandise, is hereby declared to be a dealer in second-hand goods.”

Defendants are booksellers, dealing in such stock as is usually kept in a retail book store, and buy and sell, in connection with their other business, second-hand books.…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. City of New York v. VandewaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. City of Chicago v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. City of Chicago v. Northern Paper Stock Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. City of Chicago v. Iroquois Steel & Iron Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API