City of New York v. Vandewater
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff j The City of New York, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of the defendant, rendered on the 5th day of' September, 1905, dismissing the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
JENKS, J.:
This action is for a violation of sections 1, 2 and 22; of an ordinance of the city óf New York relating to businesses requiring a *457license. The complaint was dismissed on trial and' the city appeals. The said section 1 reads: “ The following businesses must be duly licensed as herein provided, namely, public cartmen, truckmen, hack-men, cabmen, expressmen, drivers, junk dealers, dealers in secondhand articles, hawkers, peddlers, venders, ticket speculators, coal scalpers, common shows, shooting galleries, bowling alleys, billiard tables, dirt carts, exterior hoists and stands within…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Grand Rapids v. BraudyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Commonwealth v. FarnumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- City of Duluth v. BloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Eastman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Commonwealth v. RingoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mayer v. TOWN OF MONTCLAIR BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Ex Parte ScottCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Jaffe Corp., Inc. v. Board of Adjustment, EtcCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- City of Birmingham v. Hoffman & RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- People v. NiermanNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.