Legal Opinion

Lowell v. Bickford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 4, 1909PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This case was tried by a judge * without a jury. He made a general finding against both the defendants, and the case is here on their exceptions. The evidence warranted a finding that the following were the facts:

The Winnisimmet National Bank was the holder of a promissory note for §1,000, signed by one O. H. Perry, payable to and indorsed by the defendant Scott F. Bickford, which fell due on March 1, 1902. This note had been discounted for Bickford, but Bickford handed the proceeds to Perry. At maturity the note came back unpaid and duly protested. The cashier of the bank then demanded…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Goodwin v. Massachusetts Loan & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Little v. ObrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  4. National Pemberton Bank v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. National Revere Bank v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Liberty Trust Co. v. TiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Neal v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. West Rutland Trust Co. v. HoustonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API