West Rutland Trust Co. v. Houston
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
The action is brought by the receiver of the plaintiff bank to recover of the defendants, as makers, the balance due upon a promissory note. The execution and delivery of the note to the plaintiff, as payee, and the sum due thereon, are conceded. The special defenses pleaded by the defendants are:. (1) Failure of consideration, and (2) discharge by release or relinquishment of securities by the plaintiff. The trial was by jury, and, at the close of the evidence, a verdict was directed for the plaintiff. The defendants excepted to the direction of a verdict and to the judgment thereon. • The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Neal v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Skagit State Bank v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Turner v. BraggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
- Central Republic Trust Co. v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re Everett's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Big G Corp. v. HenrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.