Legal Opinion

Stacy v. Dorchester Awning Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 3, 1935PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action of tort brought by the administrator of the estate of Lucian D. Stacy, junior, to recover for the conscious suffering and death of the intestate alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle by the defendant’s agent. The declaration is in two counts, one for conscious suffering and one for death. There *358was a verdict for the plaintiff on each count. The case comes before us on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of its motions for directed verdicts and to the refusal of the judge to rule as requested.

There was no error.

There was evidence that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. ChadwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Conrad v. MazmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Boni v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Miller v. Flash Chemical Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Ellis v. EllisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McKenna v. AndreassiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Lydon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Capano v. MelchionnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Engel v. Boston Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Birch v. StroutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API