Legal Opinion
Ellis v. Ellison
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 2, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
These are actions of tort. The first is brought by a minor, by his next friend, to recover for personal injuries and for damage to his bicycle resulting from a collision with an automobile owned and driven by the defendant; the other is brought by the father of the minor to recover consequential damages. At the close of the evidence for the plaintiffs, the defendant filed a motion in each case for a directed verdict; the motions were granted subject to the plaintiffs’ exceptions. The cases are before us on exceptions to the allowance of these motions.
There is no substantial difference in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Reardon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- White v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Whalen v. MutrieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Boutlier v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Rizzittelli v. VestineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alholm v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Stacy v. Dorchester Awning Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- O'CONNELL v. Esso Standard Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Foley v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Parsons v. RyanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.