Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1955No. 33171Published

1Opinion of the Court

47 Wn.2d 497 (1955)

288 P.2d 463

RUTH P. YOUNG, Respondent,

v.

GEORGE W. YOUNG, Appellant.[1]

No. 33171.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 29, 1955.

Richard S. Munter, for appellant.

Thomas Malott, for respondent.

WEAVER, J.

Is it error, under the circumstances of this case, to allow plaintiff wife alimony of one hundred fifty dollars per month, until the further order of court?

Plaintiff wife and defendant husband, both now fifty-three years of age, were married in 1921. Two sons, one adopted, are grown and self-supporting. At least as early as 1946, the parties separated as husband…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hogan v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Lockhart v. LockhartWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Holcomb v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Gordon v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Mertens v. MertensWashington Supreme Court · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API