Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Lockhart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1927No. 20646. Department OnePublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

Tbe respondent, Mae Lockbart, and tbe appellant, W. T. Lockbart, were formerly busband and wife. Tbey were divorced by a decree of tbe superior court of King county, entered September 1, 1920. Tbe appellant is a dentist by profession, and from a time some years prior to tbe entry of tbe decree of divorce, bad conducted, and now conducts, a dental office in tbe city of Seattle. At tbe time of tbe entry of tbe decree, tbe parties agreed upon a property settlement. Tbe decree is silent as to tbe terms of tbe settlement, further than it provides that tbe appellant shall pay to tbe respondent as…

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Fisch v. MarlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. In Re Marriage of LukensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Young v. YoungWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Storm v. StormWyoming Supreme Court · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API