Lockhart v. Lockhart
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
Tbe respondent, Mae Lockbart, and tbe appellant, W. T. Lockbart, were formerly busband and wife. Tbey were divorced by a decree of tbe superior court of King county, entered September 1, 1920. Tbe appellant is a dentist by profession, and from a time some years prior to tbe entry of tbe decree of divorce, bad conducted, and now conducts, a dental office in tbe city of Seattle. At tbe time of tbe entry of tbe decree, tbe parties agreed upon a property settlement. Tbe decree is silent as to tbe terms of tbe settlement, further than it provides that tbe appellant shall pay to tbe respondent as…
2Cited by32 opinions
- Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Fisch v. MarlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re Marriage of LukensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Young v. YoungWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
- Storm v. StormWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.