Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Sutton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Multnomah.: Calvin TJ. Gantenbein, Judge. This is a suit by Rosa B. Sutton against James N. Sutton for divorce, in which defendant filed a cross-complaint. From a decree in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals! Respondent moves to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

In Banc.

■ Mr. Justice McBeide

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff brought a suit against defendant for divorce, who answered with a cross-complaint, asking that he be decreed a divorce from plaintiff. Upon the trial there was a decree in favor of defendant, from *11which plaintiff appeals. The undertaking given by plaintiff complied in form and substance with the statute, except that by a clerical error the undertaking provided that:

“Appellant will pay all damages, costs, and disbursements which may be awarded against the defendant on the appeal.”

1, 2. Defendant’s counsel filed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mahoney v. McKinmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Sanborn v. FitzpatrickOregon Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schoren v. SchorenOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Rugh v. SoleimOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Fuller v. FullerOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Daly v. Wolfard Bros., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Steed v. CavanaughOregon Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API