Legal Opinion

Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Four-Four, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2009No. 20070828PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Appellants Mid-America Pipeline Company and Williams Field Services Company (Mid-America 1 ) ask us to determine whether the claims it wishes to file in a Third Amended Complaint comply with the terms of a release agreement it entered into with Appel-lee Four-Four, Inc. (Four-Four). It also asks us to determine whether the district court violated the law of the case by holding that those claims are not consistent with the release agreement.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Mid-America and Four-Four entered into an agreement pursuant to which Four-Four was to construct…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. IHC Health Services, Inc. v. D & K MANAGEMENT, INC.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Estate of FlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Brady v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc. v. State Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. C.O.P. Coal Development Co. v. C.W. Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. McCleve Properties, LLC v. D. Ray Hult Family Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API