Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Four-Four, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 Appellants Mid-America Pipeline Company and Williams Field Services Company (Mid-America 1 ) ask us to determine whether the claims it wishes to file in a Third Amended Complaint comply with the terms of a release agreement it entered into with Appel-lee Four-Four, Inc. (Four-Four). It also asks us to determine whether the district court violated the law of the case by holding that those claims are not consistent with the release agreement.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Mid-America and Four-Four entered into an agreement pursuant to which Four-Four was to construct…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- IHC Health Services, Inc. v. D & K MANAGEMENT, INC.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
- Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Estate of FlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Brady v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc. v. State Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- C.O.P. Coal Development Co. v. C.W. Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- McCleve Properties, LLC v. D. Ray Hult Family Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.