Legal Opinion
United States v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 17, 1984No. Nos. 82-1678 to 82-1687, 82-1689 to 82-1691, 82-1732, 83-1613 and 83-1686PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION EN BANC
COFFIN, Circuit Judge.
These multiple appeals from drug conspiracy convictions resulted in reversals by a panel of our court, which found that a section of the Massachusetts wiretap statute, Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. ch. 272, § 99 F(1), identifying officials empowered to apply for wiretap warrants, afforded less procedural protection than did the comparable section of the federal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2516(2). A petition for rehearing en banc was granted, the panel’s opinion withdrawn, supplemental briefs submitted, and reargument had. We now decide that the Massachusetts statute,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. DavidCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Yeje-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. CassiereCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Timothy French v. Pan Am Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.