Legal Opinion

State v. Kluti Kaah Native Village of Copper Center

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1992No. S-4712PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

We granted this emergency petition to review the superior court’s issuance of a preliminary injunction which, essentially, replaced the State Board of Game’s seven day general moose hunt with a twenty-six day subsistence hunt for residents of the Kluti Kaah Native Village of Copper Center. The state contends that the superior court misapplied the “balance of hardships” test in issuing the injunction and, generally, overstepped its authority. Kluti Kaah responds that the court’s equitable powers were properly invoked to protect them from an illegal regulation and that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Madison v. Alaska Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Meier v. State, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Messerli v. Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. North Kenai Peninsula Road Maintenance Service Area v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cooper v. CooperAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Lake & Peninsula Borough Assembly v. OberlatzAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Wee v. EggenerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Sprucewood Investment Corp. v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API