Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 1993No. 90C-20597; CA A68013; 90C-20596; CA A68015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

This case is before us for a second time. Defendants were each convicted of four felony drug offenses charged as “part of a drug manufacture scheme.” ORS 475.992. In our opinion, we reversed and remanded the convictions with instructions to dismiss the indictments. 111 Or App 449, 823 P2d 1053 (1992). Before the time ran for filing a petition for review, we allowed the state’s motion to hold this case in abeyance pending the Supreme Court’s determination on the “scheme or network” issue. In State v. Ferrell, 315 Or 213, 843 P2d 939 (1992), the Supreme Court held that the remedy for a “scheme…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ReadyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. McIntyre/PereiraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. McIntyre/PereiraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API