Legal Opinion

State v. McIntyre/Pereira

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 6, 1993No. 91-3087-B-C-1, 91-3087-A-C-1 CA A73614 (Control), CA A73615Published

1Opinion of the Court

860 P.2d 299 (1993)

123 Or. App. 436

STATE of Oregon, Appellant,

v.

David Ronald McINTYRE, Respondent.

STATE of Oregon, Appellant,

v.

Claudia Prorok PEREIRA, Respondent.

91-3087-B-C-1, 91-3087-A-C-1; CA A73614 (Control), CA A73615.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 5, 1992.

Decided October 6, 1993.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

David A. Hill, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ChinnOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. DixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API