Legal Opinion

Cole v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1923No. 11,599Published

1Opinion

Petition for Rehearing.

McMahan, C. J.

Appellant, in support of his petition for rehearing insists that we erred in holding the action of the board of commissioners was not void and subject to collateral attack because the road as ordered improved did not coincide with the line of the road as described in the petition, but departed therefrom for a distance of about 1,200 feet where the road passed around the lake and also because the road as ordered improved did not include the west two miles of the road described in the petition.

Appellant says the opinion in this case is in conflict with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gilson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Board of Commissioner v. HarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Gold v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Jones v. CullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Koepke v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API