Legal Opinion
Schuelenburg & Boeckler v. Martin
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas
Decided June 14, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCrary, C. J.
This is a bill to foreclose a mortgage executed by Hugo Kullak to the plaintiffs. The defendants are the heirs at law of the mortgagor, who, since the execution of the mortgage, has deceased.
The evidence shows that plaintiffs, and the said Kullak, about the first day of April, 1869, entered into a contract as follows: The plaintiffs, who were dealers in lumber at St. Louis, Missouri, agreed to furnish to said Kullak, who was engaged in the same business at Topeka, Kansas, such quantities of lumber as he might order for a period of one year, on a credit of 60 days, provided no order for more…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Field v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- U. States v. January & PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- John W. Sullivan Co. v. Mutual Trust Co. of Westchester CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Black Diamond Coal Co. v. O'NeilDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1894
- Cobb v. Hills-Corbet Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Nichols, Shepherd & Co. v. KnowlesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1881
- Kendrick State Bank v. BarnumIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.