Legal Opinion

United States v. Benny E. Avery and Joseph W. Boothman

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1981No. 81-1552, 81-1553PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellants Benny E. Avery (Avery) and Joseph W. Boothman (Boothman) seek to appeal two orders entered by the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. The first order denied defendants’ motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. This order was dated and filed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Jacqueline Selph v. Council of the City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Jack Leon LucasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. Gary Stewart Buckley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  5. James R. Durham, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald A. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Louis A. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. ChaneyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  4. United States v. Benny E. Avery and Joseph W. BoothmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Rafael Nunez-Lopez, Also Known as Rafael Preciado, Also Known as Rafael PerciodoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API