Legal Opinion

Smith v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1992No. Docket 126041PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10).

This case involves the intentional-tort exception to the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.131; MSA 17.237(131). Plaintiff first argues that the trial court erred in finding that the 1987 amendment of § 131 should be applied retroactively. This Court has consistently held that the amendment applies retroactively. Shipman v Fontaine Truck Equipment Co, 184 Mich App 706, 715; 459 NW2d 30 (1990); McNees v…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Pawlak v. Redox Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Amorello v. Monsanto Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. McNees v. Cedar Springs Stamping Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cavalier Manufacturing Co. v. Employers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Cavalier Mfg. Co. v. Employers Insurance of WausauMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Travis v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. McNees v. Cedar Springs Stamping Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Peoples State Bank v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API