Amorello v. Monsanto Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order granting defendants’ motions for sum mary disposition. Plaintiffs allege that they suffered a variety of medical problems as a result of exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (pcbs) which allegedly leaked from a Detroit Edison electrical transformer located in their backyard. Defendant Monsanto was the manufacturer of the electrical transformer. Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in granting summary disposition because sufficient evidence existed to raise a question of material fact regarding whether plaintiffs suffered adverse health…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Pauley v. HallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Viterbo v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1986
- Ewers v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Paul v. U.S. Mutual Financial Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Barber v. Smh (Us), IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rubanick v. Witco Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- H J Tucker & Associates, Inc. v. Allied Chucker & Engineering Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Great Lakes Div. v. City of EcorseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.