Legal Opinion
Madkour v. Zoltak
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 2, 2007No. 05-447PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiffs Madkours, Moodys, Goffs, Welshes, and Trustees of the Carol B. Welsh Living Trust (collectively, “neighbors”) appeal a superior court order granting summary judgment to defendants, Zoltaks. Neighbors own parcels of land in Manchester, Vermont that once comprised the so-called Ames Farm. Zoltaks, who also own a parcel derived from the farm, seek to subdivide and develop the southern portion of their lands. Neighbors brought an action for declaratory judgment in the Bennington Superior Court claiming that restrictive covenants burden Zoltaks’ lands, and seeking a determination…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mellin v. Flood Brook Union School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Bacon v. LascellesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Price v. LelandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Gochey v. Bombardier, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Creed v. ClogstonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kathleen Vanderbloom v. State of Vermont, Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Roy H.A. Watson III v. The Village at Northshore I Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Patch v. Springfield School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- BELDOCK v. Town of CharlotteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Tibbetts v. MICHAELIDESSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.