Legal Opinion

Qualls, Inc. v. Berryman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 9, 1990No. 89SA63PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack

Qualls, Inc. appeals an order entered by the District Court, Water Division No. 1 (the water court), denying Qualls’ motion to amend a 1988 order entered by the water court. The water court’s 1988 order modified the water court’s 1984 decree of conditional water rights claimed by Qualls. The 1988 order removed the diligence requirement from the 1984 decree and declared that the water court would retain jurisdiction over Qualls’ well. The water court entered the 1988 order pursuant to subsection 37-92-305(11), 15 C.R.S. (Supp.1989). Qualls argues that the water court had no jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Continental Title Co. v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Salida School District R-32-J v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Service Oil Co. v. RhodusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  5. State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Evans v. Board of County Commissioners of County of Boulder, ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  4. People in Interest of NFColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API