Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Malleable & Grey Iron Works v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWicichem, J.

The sole question in this case is whether there is any evidence to sustain the award of the Industrial Commission. This requires a review of the facts.

Applicant was born in Poland, January 8, 1872, and had worked as a molder in foundries for some twenty-five to thirty years. The last fifteen or sixteen years of his employ ment was at plaintiff’s foundry. He quit work on May 19, 1936, and on August 14, 1937, had his right leg amputated above the knee because of tuberculosis of the knee joint. Applicant’s father died of pneumonia in 1913; one of his daughters died October 15, 1933, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Vilter Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Pfister & Vogel Leather Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Kannenberg Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Liberty Foundry, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Superior v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Simpsen v. Madison General Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. MILWAUKEE ER & T. CO. v. Industrial Comm.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Universal Foundry Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API