Legal Opinion

Liberty Foundry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

In 1912, Murawski, hereinafter called the “applicant,” started working in foundries. He eventually became a moulder and up to February 18, 1935, had worked for several foundries. On August 1, 1933, he was examined by Dr. O. A. Sander in connection with an application for work for a company other than plaintiff. The doctor's conclusions were that applicant then had a slight amount of fibrosis in the chest and an apparently healed scar in his left upper lung. The doctor’s recommendations were that the scar was sufficiently healed and the fibrosis sufficiently slight to warrant his employment.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. William Rahr Sons Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Pruno v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Rhinelander Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. MILWAUKEE ER & T. CO. v. Industrial Comm.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Milwaukee Malleable & Grey Iron Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API