Massillon Savings & Loan Co. v. Imperial Finance Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
For the purpose of this decision various dates involved in the transaction become important. On March 31,1923, the contract entered into between the parties was valid. It was neither malum in se nor malum prohibitum. However, before this contract had been executed, and while it still remained executory, and before the membership sales had been completed, the Legislature of this state passed a law prohibiting the sale of memberships for a fee or compensation. This law became effective on July 2, 1923, and at a time when these memberships still remained unsold. In the case of State ex rel.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- American Mercantile Exchange v. BluntSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
- State Ex Rel. Crabbe v. Massillon Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
- Gray v. SimsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1814
3Cited by14 opinions
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Am. Family Ins. Co. v. HoopOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- McGill v. CarlosGuernsey County Court of Common Pleas · 1947
- Stark County Milk Producers' Ass'n v. TabelingOhio Supreme Court · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.