Legal Opinion
People v. Dickinson
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 11, 1980No. Crim. 10490PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARDNER, P. J.
Following denial of his suppression motion, defendant pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana for sale. The appeal challenges the stop and search of defendant’s vehicle at a California plant quarantine inspection station.
The California Department of Agriculture maintains a list of quarantined pests harmful to the agriculture of this state. These pests may be either animal or vegetable. Agricultural Code section 5341 provides: “To prevent the introduction into, or the spread within this state, of pests, the director shall maintain at such places within this state as he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Terry Lee SchaferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ingersoll v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Commonwealth v. AtaligDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.