Legal Opinion

Kilcullen v. Calbom & Schwab, PSC

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 15, 2013No. 30792-1-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Siddoway, A.C.J.

¶1 The law firm of Calbom & Schwab PSC (C&S) appeals the trial court’s summary judgment *197determination that a shareholder loan received from a former partner, Kathleen Kilcullen, was due, was owing, and must be promptly paid. We agree with the law firm that the court relied on its concern over a long, unexplained delay in payment by the law firm and the possibility of a legal basis for immediate liability rather than on a demonstration by Ms. Kilcullen that undisputed facts support relief. On the record presented, summary judgment was unwarranted. We reverse and remand.

FACTS…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capistrant v. Lifetouch Nat'l Sch. Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. David Martin v. Gonzaga UniversityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Northwood Estates, Llc v. Lennar Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Shappa Baker v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API